Skip to main content

CAN’T WAIT ‘TIL WE HAVE OUR OWN MEDIA

 If the white (or Black but white sponsored) media spent just 1% of their venue calling out the DNC smoking memo warning lib candidates to show us no love, 


then Black folk in swing states (the key block in the electoral college) would be given a reason to vote en-masse and change the tide like they did with Obama.


But this is by design.


Again, 85% of Black folk vote Dem when they do cast a ballot. Those numbers aren’t gonna change with Russian hacking or the supposed Black Republican constituents.


The ONLY demographic with a higher liberal bent is Native Americans. So even if the worst of what white savagery says were true, it would STILL be insignificant.


And if they can besmirch Ice, with 30+ years of Blackpositive receipts, what hope is there for the rest of us?


Can’t wait ‘til we have our own media. Everything changes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ON REPARATIONS

Never banter with white folk about reparations. It’s like arguing with your boss about wages they haven’t paid you. The only acceptable answer, whether they can give it or not, is “Yeah… You right!” Anything less from them is pure toxicity.

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PERSUASION AND CONVICTION

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PERSUASION AND CONVICTION Decades ago, in my teens, my oldest brother and I had a talk where I said, “Can you believe that they’re having another gay pride parade?” He told me that he participated in a gay pride parade. Then we just stared at one another - and because many don’t know how to communicate without language, I will translate: Me: (But you’re not gay) Him: (True, but our struggle is their struggle and theirs is ours) Me: (Hmmm. Now I have to rethink everything because this is my brother whom I love challenging my core beliefs). I was persuaded that day. Today, my brother is long dead but I’m still reposting. That’s called CONVICTION.

Rigged Legal System

Search words: Rigged Legal System, Gauntlet of oppression, racial profiling throughout  Years ago on jury duty, I was asked to render a ‘fair and impartial’ judgement regarding a young Black man accused of possession on the Upper East Side. There were only two Black people on the jury, myself and another dude. After a very long time, we ended up finding the defendant guilty. That’s the end of the story but not the narrative. The twelve main things I came to realize: 1. Several Black potential jurors were citing a mantra about their unwillingness to participate in a prejudiced judicial system. It was my first time hearing it but should I be called again, I’ll google it and voice my objection in the same way. 2. The suspect was stopped for a broken taillight, but as his wife said when she examined their car at the station, the light was never broken. 3. The white judge, however, ruled that the bust was still legit even though he was clearly stopped for drivin...